Zilnic oferim programe licențiate GRATUITE pe care altfel ar trebui să le cumpărați!
Giveaway of the day — Photo-Lux 3.6
Photo-Lux 3.6 a fost chilipirul zilei în 25 aprilie 2010
Photo-Lux este un program extins de vizualizare imagini ce dispune de o mulţime de opţiuni de procesare a imaginii precum corecţie RGB / luminozitate / contrast / gamma, balans autotomat de alb, reducere efect „ochi roşii”, etc.
Oferă suport pentru orice tip de fişier vă puteţi sau nu imagina (inclusiv aproape toate formatele de camera RAW). Include posibilitatea de a crea succesiuni de imagini şi albume HTML. Pentru formatele JPEG, TIFF şi RAW foloseşte eticheta EXIF pentru a roti automat imaginile.
Cerinţe minime de sistem:
Windows 2000/XP/2003/VISTA/7
Publicist:
KUDRSOFTPagina de pornire:
http://www.yukudr.com/imageviewer/Dimensiunile fişierului:
2.81 MB
Preţ:
$19.99
GIVEAWAY download basket
Comentarii la Photo-Lux 3.6
Please add a comment explaining the reason behind your vote.
After trying this program I found it to be a fairly basic photo editing program. I can honestly say that Photoscape has all this plus more and it's for free.
A GENERAL WORD OF CAUTION:During the installation of today's GAOTD program, all of your "image-rights" configurations are over-written. . . . In other words, this program (without ANY permission or authorization from the individual installing it) sets itself as your DEFAULT program to open all image-type files and more.Photo-Lux sets itself as the "Default" for these file types:1. all General Image files (gif, jpeg, tiff . . . etc)2. all Raw image files (J2K, ERF, MFF, etc)3. all Photoshop files (PSD, PDD, etc.) 4. all Windows Cursor files (CUR)5. all Windows Icon files (ICO, etc)6. all Raster files (TGA, TARGA, etc.)The program changed the permissions of over 40 of my files types, including several customizations that had been created for special editing of professional photography.Thumbs-Down to ANY program which takes it upon itself to steal file-permissions (other than files which are exclusive to the program itself). To me, this indicates a complete and total disregard for the user. Come on developers! . . . Do you honestly think that your users will stand for such behavior in today’s software world? I feel like I'm back in the '90s. The "customer" should be the LAST person you wish to upset, and this type of behavior instantly causes the user to become suspicious (and this was merely during the installation process!). It's 2010 now . . . and this type of problem should never (ever) happen with software of any type.Because of this behavior, the program was immediately un-installed and thrown in the trash.
Significantly inferior to Zoner Photo Studio, another recent GOTD giveaway.
As of the time of this post, only three comments have cleared moderation, none helpful.
"Significantly inferior to Zoner Photo Studio, another recent GOTD giveaway."
ZPS is a photo studio, like it says, not an "extended image viewer", and costs much more.
"After trying this program I found it to be a fairly basic photo editing program. I can honestly say that Photoscape has all this plus more and it’s for free."
I can honestly say that you haven't compared the two at all.
"Can anyone elaborate what this can do that Fast Stone Image viewer cannot do?"
Image viewers/editors are all different, with different features. There's no harm in installing Photo-Lux, as long as you clear the file associations (you may need to right-click Photo-Lux and Run as Administrator), which it unfortunately appropriates at installation time, but it can restore them. While Photo-Lux has some interesting features, the UI is poor, and it's somewhat slow. You'll also need to test under what circumstances it modifies the original file. It does support a broad range of file types. ZPS supports a pretty broad range of file types. PhotoScape supports few file types, and is very slow. FastStone has a good UI, supports multiple monitors, and supports a fair number of file types, but not as many as Photo-Lux. IrfanView supports a large number of file types.
The question isn't which is "better", but which suits your needs at the moment. Would I pay for Photo-Lux? No, not considering all of the alternatives. Would I install it today? Yes, I did, because one of its features or file formats might be useful in the future.
Can anyone elaborate what this can do that Fast Stone Image viewer cannot do?
Yes I know this post is not that helpful , but then again the program I mention is what I use, and the functions that the giveaway mentions are very similar to what I use alternatively.
Ofertele iPhone de astăzi »
Ofertele Android de astăzi »
Softul are ceva probleme cu deschiderea fisierelor imagine,in schimb merge foarte bine prin metoda drag and drop. Softul este la o mare departare fata de programe gratuite ca: Chasys Draw IES Artists si LightBox Free Image Editor atat la capitolul facilitati cat si la capitolul design.
Save | Cancel